Fake, lie and so-called dominance of western science .

We have errant by the western education what we get. Even today, so-called scholars use western’s outdated thesis as the knowledge.

 They see a person who criticizes the western’s fake thesis as a villain. The
western knowledge which is built on lie and guessing worships as sightless imitations. It’s clearly brought out here.

Newtonian law of motion is the major thesis of Newtonian materialism and second law is more important from that. It is clear to say that it has been used to prove the first law, Aristotle’s dynamic theory is wrong.

 Second law describes what happen when
an external force is on a particle or an object. But they say it happens only in an Intertial frame of reference. Did Newton too observe his law in an interial frame of reference?

 No, never. 

When an intertial frame of reference can’t be seen beforehand or never seen Newton too didn’t observe it in a fair circumstance.

 That means even they haven’t use this so-called method, the scientific method as they say. As it is so, why do litterateurs accept this as the real, eternal truth? 

Even though everyone can see the lie laid above on thesis, the so-called litterateurs don’t present any criticism on them. Because of their knowledge also has become a lie, if they do so. As well as they consider only the western’s knowledge as the knowledge.

There are wonderful stories woven on the objects which are fallen down from the above by well educated, Aristotle. He may observe the solid such as stones fallen down faster than the objects such as feathers. As well as he may observe the objects that fallen down suddenly.

Later, Galileo also wanted to bring out a comment based on this. He wanted to do an explanation about the objects which do not fall suddenly. He brought out that there is because of the unfelling object vacuums. If it is a vacuum, drop down objects fall down suddenly.

 If it is a feather or a piece of iron, they fall down suddenly in a vacuum. So, did Galileo come to a conclusion after go through the facts they mentioned in a vacuum?

 No, never. 

Why didn’t they follow the western’s so-called scientific method which carries collecting data, observing data, analyzing and come to a conclusion? As it is so, why so-called litterateurs accept them as the science in a glamorous way? 

How much they are arrogant to ask whether the Buddhism is scientific. When the western science is not scientific, how ungracious to compare the Buddhism with it?

 When there are Aristotle, Newton and Galileo who considered as giants of the science, have uttered such lies and thesis, what about the other litterateurs?

 #############################################################

·        *“Westerns have introduced a so-called scientific method to cover the untruthfulness of western science. Although they know well that the western science is a myth, they do say there are no so-called scientific method of the knowledge and other knowledgeable ways are myths except the western science.”

·        “So-called scientific methods have built to cover the untruthfulness of the science. When they can’t continue the untruthfulness, westerns change their fictitious as they wish. And they call them as so-called scientific method. ” 

·        However untruthful theses are untruthful. On the other hand, when it brings out misleading editions how much they needed, there is a possibility to retain their untruthful thesis.

 

The uncritical society believes that whoever experiment about the world where ever, there should be survival to the assumptions of westerns.